Speech

What helps me step outside my solipsist mind

On days filled with gathering knowledge and learning

Von Holger Windfuhr


Die Rede unten hielt der Art-Direk­tor Hol­ger Wind­fuhr vor Absol­ven­ten der Stu­di­en­gän­ge Kom­mu­ni­ka­ti­ons­de­sign der Hoch­schu­le Konstanz.

First off: con­gra­tu­la­ti­ons to the gra­dua­ting class of 2016!

I have a Ger­man name, but was born and rai­sed in the United Sta­tes. So I hope you will indul­ge my giving this talk in my mother ton­gue. I think you deser­ve a level of elo­quence that I can­not live up to in the Ger­man lan­guage. Plus: it makes me seem more intel­li­gent than I real­ly am.

When Jochen Räde­ker asked me if I would like to hold the com­mence­ment speech, I said yes wit­hout thin­king. Only after­wards did I think to mys­elf: “What in God’s name do you peo­p­le want to hear from me?” Then I recal­led a com­mence­ment speech by the gre­at aut­hor and phi­lo­so­pher David Fos­ter Wal­lace. His thoughts and per­spec­ti­ve real­ly reso­na­ted with me, and arti­cu­la­ted what, up to that point, I hadn’t been able to. So I deci­ded to adapt part of it. And as Pablo Picas­so said: “Good artists copy, gre­at artists ste­al.” Who am I to ques­ti­on Pablo?

Two young fish are swim­ming along and they hap­pen to meet an older fish swim­ming the other way. The older fish nods at them and says
“Mor­ning, boys. How’s the water?”
The two young fish swim on for a bit. Then one of them looks over at the other and asks
“What the hell is water?”

I’m not the wise old fish. The point of the fish sto­ry is mere­ly that the most obvious, important rea­li­ties are often the ones that are har­dest to see. Being tru­ly awa­re of what is around us.

You, like me when I finis­hed design school twen­ty-five years ago, lear­ned about typo­gra­phy, color theo­ry, prin­ting tech­ni­ques, html, design histo­ry, illus­tra­ti­on, pho­to­gra­phy, and much more. Your days, like mine, were fil­led with gathe­ring know­ledge and lear­ning how to think about design and lear­ning approa­ches to pro­blem-sol­ving. And you, like me, have enjoy­ed the sup­port of your par­ents, grand­par­ents, fri­ends and tea­chers in get­ting your education.

The grea­test cli­ché about edu­ca­ti­on is that it is not such much about fil­ling you up with know­ledge, but about tea­ching you how to think. But the cli­ché about tea­ching you how to think actual­ly goes much deeper. The real­ly signi­fi­cant edu­ca­ti­on in thin­king isn’t just about the capa­ci­ty to think, but also about lear­ning to exer­cise some con­trol over how and what you think, and con­scious­ly choo­sing what to think about. To real­ly ques­ti­on and con­front the often auto­ma­tic way we react to oppo­sing views, cri­ti­cism, annoyan­ces – and dai­ly life. To not get lost in abs­tract argu­ments insi­de our heads ins­tead of sim­ply pay­ing atten­ti­on to what is going on right in front of us, in the world around us. To not assu­me that ever­y­thing is being done spe­ci­fi­cal­ly to me, and for me or against my ideas.

It’s not about right or wrong. It’s a mat­ter of my choo­sing to make the effort of somehow get­ting free of my natu­ral default set­ting. Which is to be deep­ly self-cen­te­red and to see and inter­pret ever­y­thing through this lens of self. Becau­se if you can­not exer­cise this kind of con­scious choice in how and what to think about, you will be total­ly lost.

I can only tell you about my expe­ri­en­ces, and what I have found to be true for me. What helps me step out­side my solip­sist mind when I feel it beco­ming too small a space.

I grew up in a tru­ly mul­ti-cul­tu­ral sur­roun­ding. A uni­ver­si­ty town whe­re all sorts of natio­na­li­ties gra­vi­ta­ted. Japa­ne­se, Chi­ne­se, Iraqi, Ira­ni­an, Ger­man, French – even Swiss. The inte­rest in other cul­tures and their way of thin­king about the world has accom­pa­nied me ever sin­ce. I was con­fron­ted by all sorts of dif­fe­rent views – some­ti­mes dra­ma­ti­cal­ly dif­fe­rent opi­ni­ons on things I felt very stron­gly about. They chal­len­ged me to think about why I think the way I do.

Back then the Inter­net as we know it had not yet been born. The sin­gle big­gest repo­si­to­ry of know­ledge – but also of bull­shit – man­kind has ever known. It wasn’t as easy to get lost in the echo cham­bers of »Face­book« time­lines and spe­cial­ty blogs that sim­ply repeat back to me what I alre­a­dy belie­ve to be true.

Don’t get me wrong: I think the Inter­net and the Inter­net of Things is one of the grea­test deve­lo­p­ments for our pro­fes­si­on – on a socie­tal sca­le as well. It frees design from ador­ning paper pulp and film strips to beco­me tru­ly inter­ac­ti­ve and mul­ti­me­di­al on a glo­bal sca­le. It allows us to com­mu­ni­ca­te on an indi­vi­du­al level. The­re has never been a grea­ter oppor­tu­ni­ty for us. And I say this not in spi­te of but espe­ci­al­ly as a mem­ber of a publi­shing group.

But it takes tre­men­dous will to seek out artic­les and inter­act with peo­p­le who have oppo­sing views. To dis­co­ver how other cul­tures inter­pret what is hap­pe­ning in the world, on our con­ti­nent, in our coun­try. The Ame­ri­can view, the Eng­lish view, the French, Rus­si­an, Scan­di­na­vi­an, Chi­ne­se view; the intellec­tu­al Ger­man com­men­ta­ry – and even the less intellec­tu­al com­men­ta­ry. But I pro­mi­se you, it will be worth it. It’s a well­spring for your work, an end­less sup­p­ly of refe­ren­ces, jux­ta­po­si­ti­ons and ide­as to play with. The intellec­tu­al depth will shi­ne through.

Ano­ther thing I have found to be true for me: being trus­ted is ever­y­thing; espe­ci­al­ly in our pro­fes­si­on, whe­re our opi­ni­on isn’t based on a mathe­ma­ti­cal for­mu­la or sci­en­ti­fic method. Trust in our pro­fes­sio­nal inte­gri­ty is the one thing that makes the dif­fe­rence bet­ween being able to do gre­at or medio­cre work. Trust is what allows us to take risks. But ear­ning that trust also means being able to put yours­elf into someone else’s posi­ti­on and con­sider their cri­te­ria for good work. What they need it to do and how they need to com­mu­ni­ca­te with their audi­ence and who else they turn to in jud­ging the qua­li­ty of design. And who they need to impress, both insi­de and out­side the company.

Be curious. Not just about what new fonts are coming out, what the coo­le­st par­al­lax scrolls are or what new inde­pen­dent maga­zi­nes are being published. They are a means to an end. The end is what and how we want to com­mu­ni­ca­te. What audi­ence are we com­mu­ni­ca­ting to? The con­text in which we are com­mu­ni­ca­ting. The awa­re­ness of socie­tal shifts, bumps and grinds. Awa­re­ness of what and who is affec­ting socie­ty, and why. Awa­re­ness in not belie­ving the hype.

It is in essence about the real value of a real edu­ca­ti­on. It has almost not­hing to do with know­ledge, and ever­y­thing to do with simp­le awa­re­ness. Awa­re­ness of what is in plain sight all around us, all the time. That we have to keep redis­co­ve­ring and remin­ding our­sel­ves over and over:
»This is water.«
»This is water.«

I wish you all gre­at success.


Doppelausgabe Nr. 8 und 9, Herbst 2016

Datenschutz-Übersicht
Sprache für die Form * Forum für Design und Rhetorik

Diese Website verwendet Cookies, damit wir dir die bestmögliche Benutzererfahrung bieten können. Cookie-Informationen werden in deinem Browser gespeichert und führen Funktionen aus, wie das Wiedererkennen von dir, wenn du auf unsere Website zurückkehrst, und hilft unserem Team zu verstehen, welche Abschnitte der Website für dich am interessantesten und nützlichsten sind.

Unbedingt notwendige Cookies

Unbedingt notwendige Cookies sollten jederzeit aktiviert sein, damit wir deine Einstellungen für die Cookie-Einstellungen speichern können.