Book Review

Drop a word in the ocean of meaning”

Robert Bringhurst charts language

Eine Rezension von Brian Switzer


What are the dif­fe­ren­ces bet­ween spo­ken and writ­ten lan­guage? What can the­se dif­fe­ren­ces tell us about human com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on and under­stan­ding? How has typo­gra­phy and design chan­ged writ­ten lan­guage? Robert Bringhurst’s book “The Solid Form of Lan­guage, an Essay on Wri­ting and Mea­ning” was writ­ten in 2002 for an antho­lo­gy on lan­guage cul­tu­re and type and repu­blished by the Gas­pe­reau Press in 2004. Bring­hurst descri­bes hims­elf as a poet, lin­gu­ist and typo­grapher – in short someone with a wide inte­rest in lan­guage. He has writ­ten “The Ele­ments of Typo­gra­phic Style” and has published books on nati­ve Ame­ri­can poets, writ­ten about the inter­pre­ta­ti­on of renais­sance ita­li­an pain­tings[1]. To round out his impres­si­ve list of abili­ties, Bring­hurst speaks, reads and wri­tes in a ran­ge of lan­guages. His poe­tic natu­re is clear right from the start: “Drop a word in the oce­an of mea­ning and con­cen­tric ripp­les from. […] To catch the mea­ning of the words is not to catch the ripp­les that they cau­se; it is to catch the inter­ac­tion of tho­se ripp­les. This is what it means to lis­ten; this is what it means to read. It is incre­di­bly com­plex, yet humans do it every day, and often laugh and weep at the same time.” (p. 9) This poe­tic begin­ning and the ele­gant pocket for­mat set the sce­ne for a brief intellec­tu­al jour­ney into writ­ten language.

From this poe­tic inde­ed almost visu­al begin­ning Bring­hurst takes his rea­ders on a breathl­ess trip through a histo­ry of writ­ten lan­guages and their deve­lo­p­ment, the uni­que­ness and fun­da­men­tal dif­fe­ren­ces bet­ween writ­ten and spo­ken lan­guage. Bring­hurst wri­tes: “Start­ing from scratch, with no impor­ted models, peo­p­le have made the shift from oral to lite­ra­te cul­tu­re at least three times … In Meso­po­ta­mia, about 5,000 years ago, in nor­t­hern Chi­na about 4,500 years ago, and in Gua­ta­ma­la and sou­thern Mexi­co about 2,000 years ago, humans crea­ted a script and a scri­bal cul­tu­re, appar­ent­ly wit­hout impor­ted models of any kind.” (p. 14) The­se ear­ly sys­tems were all ori­gi­nal­ly pic­tu­re-based or drawn. After a pre­cise defi­ni­ti­on of wri­ting (to dif­fe­ren­tia­te it from dra­wing) the four points lis­ted here are dis­cus­sed in grea­ter detail. “(1) Wri­ting is abs­tract. […] (2) A wri­ting sys­tem is codi­fied. It con­sists of a repea­ting set of sym­bols […] (3) The­se sym­bols are defi­ned in terms of some­thing else. […] (4) The sys­tem is sty­li­sti­cal­ly as well as sym­bo­li­cal­ly self-con­tai­ned.” (p. 16f) He covers a small sel­ec­tion of scripts inclu­ding: basic chi­ne­se glyphs, latin, ara­bic, kore­an and nati­ve ame­ri­can wri­ting sys­tems as well as dis­cus­sing their sty­li­stic heri­ta­ges. Bring­hurst dif­fe­ren­tia­tes the spo­ken lan­guages as evol­ved and evol­ving, and writ­ten lan­guage as inven­ted and trai­ned (p. 12–13). This link in writ­ten lan­guage to “reli­gious or poli­ti­cal aut­ho­ri­ty” (p. 24) makes scripts emblems of cul­tures and belief sys­tems, and like belief sys­tems con­nec­ted with reli­gi­ons and empires often rigo­rous­ly spread.

Bring­hurst also looks at the evo­lu­ti­on of our wes­tern euro­pean ways of wri­ting, and how typo­gra­phic style extends the ori­gi­nal boun­da­ries of our lan­guage. His cen­tral exam­p­le (p. 45–47) is “Leo­nard Fuchs’s bota­ni­cal work De His­to­ria stir­pi­um, first published by the Basel prin­ter Micha­el Isen­grin in 1542.” (p. 44) The mixing of scripts (whe­ther more cal­li­gra­phic or con­s­truc­ted) in a sin­gle sen­tence is now com­mon, inde­ed this review is full of chan­ges from roman to ita­lic and back. So much so that we often fail to read its signi­fi­can­ce: a chan­ge in voice or tona­li­ty. In this way aspects of spo­ken lan­guage has slow­ly trans­fer­red to wri­ting. Bring­hurst also empha­si­zes that the use of other typo­gra­phic styl­es indi­ca­te shifts in con­tent. The­se ide­as were revo­lu­tio­na­ry in the Renais­sance and chan­ged how we wri­te and read today.


Ausgabe Nr. 5, Herbst 2014

Datenschutz-Übersicht
Sprache für die Form * Forum für Design und Rhetorik

Diese Website verwendet Cookies, damit wir dir die bestmögliche Benutzererfahrung bieten können. Cookie-Informationen werden in deinem Browser gespeichert und führen Funktionen aus, wie das Wiedererkennen von dir, wenn du auf unsere Website zurückkehrst, und hilft unserem Team zu verstehen, welche Abschnitte der Website für dich am interessantesten und nützlichsten sind.

Unbedingt notwendige Cookies

Unbedingt notwendige Cookies sollten jederzeit aktiviert sein, damit wir deine Einstellungen für die Cookie-Einstellungen speichern können.