Essay

Ethics into Design

On the Struggle for the Right and the Good

Von Carl Mitcham


Ethics con­sti­tu­tes an attempt to arti­cu­la­te and reflect on gui­de­lines for human acti­vi­ty and con­duct. Logic is the attempt to arti­cu­la­te and reflect on gui­de­lines for human thought. Both ethics and logic fur­ther deve­lop theo­ries about the most gene­ral prin­ci­ples and foun­da­ti­ons of their respec­ti­ve gui­de­lines. But what is it that arti­cu­la­tes and reflects on gui­de­lines for that inter­me­dia­ry bet­ween thought and action cal­led design?[1]

As an Eng­lish word, “design” is a modern deri­va­te of the Latin designa­re, to mark or point out, delinea­te, con­tri­ve, by way of the French dési­gner, to indi­ca­te or desi­gna­te, and can be defi­ned as plan­ning for action or minia­tu­re action.[2] It is remar­kab­le, howe­ver, that neither Greek nor Latin con­ta­ins any word that exact­ly cor­re­sponds to the modern word “design.” The clo­sest Greek comes to a word for “design” in the modern sen­se is per­haps hupo­graphein—to wri­te out. Much more com­mon are sim­ply enno­ein (en,in + noein, to think) and dia­no­ein (dia, through + noein, to think).

For the Greeks, human con­duct can be orde­red toward the pro­duc­tion of mate­ri­al arti­facts or non­ma­te­ri­al goods, through ποίησις (poie­sis, making), acti­vi­ty with an extrin­sic end, or it can be taken up with πραξις (pra­xis, doing), acti­vi­ty with an intrin­sic end. The pur­su­it of what is fit­ting in the domain of making is dis­co­ver­ed through τέχνη (tech­ne); in the domain of doing, through φρόνησῐς (phro­ne­sis). In a nar­row sen­se phro­ne­sis is only one among many vir­tu­es; more broad­ly, it is the foun­da­ti­on of all vir­tue and thus coex­ten­si­ve with ethics.

Bey­ond the Greeks, plan­ned making or doing—as distinct from sim­ply inten­ding to act, con­side­ra­ti­on of the ide­als reflec­ted or inten­ded by dif­fe­rent makings and doings, or the deve­lo­p­ment of skills (tech­nai) through practice—involves the sys­te­ma­tic anti­ci­pa­to­ry ana­ly­sis of human action. With regard to making, espe­ci­al­ly, such sys­te­ma­tic anti­ci­pa­to­ry ana­ly­sis ent­ails minia­tu­re or mode­led tri­al-and-error or expe­ri­men­tal acti­vi­ty. In the modern con­text, this plan­ning for making or ratio­nal­ly anti­ci­pa­to­ry minia­tu­re making, which was once sever­ely rest­ric­ted by both tra­di­tio­nal frame­works and metho­do­lo­gi­cal limi­ta­ti­ons, has beco­me the well-deve­lo­ped and dyna­mic acti­vi­ty of desig­ning or design. The lat­ter term can refer as well to the for­mal cha­rac­te­ristics of the arti­cu­la­ted plan or the sta­tic com­po­si­ti­on of the pro­duct brought forth by the sca­led-up pro­cess that emer­ges from what has also been cal­led “acti­ve con­tem­pla­ti­on.”[3] An alter­na­ti­ve might be “con­tem­pla­ti­ve (theo­re­ti­cal) action.”

The modern attempt to reflect on desig­ning or design has engen­de­red pri­ma­ri­ly stu­dies of the social or aes­the­tic qua­li­ty of desi­gned pro­ducts and ana­ly­ses of the logic or metho­do­lo­gy of design pro­ces­ses. The the­sis here is that both aes­the­tic cri­ti­cism and the logic of design must be com­ple­men­ted by the intro­duc­tion of ethics into design stu­dies, in order to con­tri­bu­te to the deve­lo­p­ment of a genui­ne­ly com­pre­hen­si­ve phi­lo­so­phy of design.


Ausgabe Nr. 18, Frühjahr 2021

Datenschutz-Übersicht
Sprache für die Form * Forum für Design und Rhetorik

Diese Website verwendet Cookies, damit wir dir die bestmögliche Benutzererfahrung bieten können. Cookie-Informationen werden in deinem Browser gespeichert und führen Funktionen aus, wie das Wiedererkennen von dir, wenn du auf unsere Website zurückkehrst, und hilft unserem Team zu verstehen, welche Abschnitte der Website für dich am interessantesten und nützlichsten sind.

Unbedingt notwendige Cookies

Unbedingt notwendige Cookies sollten jederzeit aktiviert sein, damit wir deine Einstellungen für die Cookie-Einstellungen speichern können.